Changes

Talk:Campus controversies

586 bytes added, 19:20, March 14, 2006

no edit summary

Also, the notion that Laleian and Ali are "most famous" for this incident is dishonest and inaccurate.

:A user has removed these lines from the current version of the [[Aida Laleian]] and [[Laylah Ali]] pages.--[[User:05jl|05jl]] 18:11, 14 March 2006 (EST)

~~I strongly agree with Heather and I don't think that Willipedia is the place for such inappropriate insults.~~

:It's a Wiki, so you should feel free to edit the article to make it more polite, accurate, complete and useful. I do *not* think that the article should be removed. Perhaps the board could way in. With regard to specific points:

</blockquote>

</blockquote>--[[User:05jl|05jl]] 19:11, 14 March 2006 (EST)

I have read the Willipedia guidelines and I think that the content of this article is definitely close to crossing the line about pages about professors. Also, the title of the scandal was not generated by anything except by David Kane, and while he can refer to it as such on Ephblog or in other forums, I am not sure that it is appropriate for a Willipedia page. I am not advocating that we all have "happy smiling faces," I just think that there is enough information, in the Record or other places, in the public domain about this incident so that if someone wants information about it they can find it, and there does not need to be a page with insulting comments on Willipedia. -- Lucy C-C

06lc

22

edits