Talk:Boring classes

Revision as of 18:36, May 12, 2006 by 07sdc (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Just out of curiosity, how do you know Prof. Racz wasn't a visiting prof? I had him for Stat 201 (unfortunately) and was under the impression that he was indeed visiting. Anyway, not that it matters all that much, I'm just curious.

Byorgey 10:34, 30 November 2005 (EST)

I'd like to whole-heartedly agree with whoever wrote about professor Klingenberg. His STAT 201 class was always interesting (and often amusing), he showed us interesting examples using real-life data, and overall made what could have been a really dry subject into something I looked forward to learning. I am not a math major, and would recommend the class to anyone who just wants to take something interesting and useful. You will definitely enjoy it - it is absolutely not a boring class.

Seconded. Professor Klingenberg's 201 class was entertaining and easy to understand since he explains things real well with plenty of enthusiasm. Before 201, I really disliked stats but I can say with confidence that this perspective has taken a complete 180. As a Junior (and soon to be Senior) math major, I regret that took the course so late. That's pretty much how good it was. 201 with Klingenberg is NOT a boring class. Take it off the list!