Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noteworthy E-mails"

m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I agree as well. --[[User:06mea|06mea]] 00:20, 16 March 2006 (EST)
 
I agree as well. --[[User:06mea|06mea]] 00:20, 16 March 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
Personally, I don't mind good historical research, but these events are a little too recent for comfort, and the research is cursory, at best. --[[User:06emm|Evan]] 00:24, 16 March 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 01:24, March 16, 2006

This is the discussion page for "Noteworthy E-mails". This page is where editors and readers discuss what content should and should not be in the article, and respond to others' questions and comments. Unlike articles' content pages, editors should only add material and respond to others' postings, and never make deletions. This page is intended to record the history of any debate, as well as work towards resolving it.

All commenters here should take credit for their words. When you make a change, suffix your posting with --~~~~ This will automatically record your username and the time of posting. Doing this helps seperate comments, and is consistent with Wikipedia guidelines.


What, might I ask, is the purpose of this page? We have all the relevant historical information in the Record archives, why must students be singled out in such a manner as this? --06jps 23:47, 15 March 2006 (EST)

Agreed. These pages just seem to open up old wounds and goes against the general light-hearted nature of the Willipedia. --08tdm 00:02, 16 March 2006 (EST)

I agree wholeheartedly. - Lucy C-C (sorry I can't figure/remember the tilda thing)

I agree as well. --06mea 00:20, 16 March 2006 (EST)

Personally, I don't mind good historical research, but these events are a little too recent for comfort, and the research is cursory, at best. --Evan 00:24, 16 March 2006 (EST)