| Willipedia is now back online as of 5/5/2019 |
| It has been several years since Willipedia closed. Please help get it updated! |
| Go to the Willipedia 2.0 Project to learn more. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boring classes"
m (Talk:Boring Classes moved to Talk:Boring classes) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 10:34, 30 November 2005 (EST) | [[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 10:34, 30 November 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd like to whole-heartedly agree with whoever wrote about professor Klingenberg. His STAT 201 class was always interesting (and often amusing), he showed us interesting examples using real-life data, and overall made what could have been a really dry subject into something I looked forward to learning. I am not a math major, and would recommend the class to anyone who just wants to take something interesting and useful. You will definitely enjoy it - it is absolutely not a boring class. | ||
Revision as of 15:29, May 12, 2006
Just out of curiosity, how do you know Prof. Racz wasn't a visiting prof? I had him for Stat 201 (unfortunately) and was under the impression that he was indeed visiting. Anyway, not that it matters all that much, I'm just curious.
Byorgey 10:34, 30 November 2005 (EST)
I'd like to whole-heartedly agree with whoever wrote about professor Klingenberg. His STAT 201 class was always interesting (and often amusing), he showed us interesting examples using real-life data, and overall made what could have been a really dry subject into something I looked forward to learning. I am not a math major, and would recommend the class to anyone who just wants to take something interesting and useful. You will definitely enjoy it - it is absolutely not a boring class.
