Difference between revisions of "Talk:Travels"

Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I'm not even convinced that "less-travelled" is a good description for some of these places...I mean, Canada?  Mexico? Just to name a few. --[[User:06mea|06mea]] 17:29, 17 May 2006 (EDT)
 
I'm not even convinced that "less-travelled" is a good description for some of these places...I mean, Canada?  Mexico? Just to name a few. --[[User:06mea|06mea]] 17:29, 17 May 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
A specific place should be considered obscure by Williams standards if nobody in the undergraduate population was born there or lived there. That would eliminate some of the capitals (Honolulu) and big metropolises (Beijing, Hong Kong). Come on...the capital of Greece is not obscure.

Revision as of 21:25, May 17, 2006

What counts as obscure? I wouldn't consider Beijing to be obscure, but would consider Urumqi and Kashgar (also in China) to be obscure.

I'm hoping people will list specific places they've been, rather than entire countries. The overall goal of the page is to encourage people to think about going to places other than Western Europe for research, study abroad, etc. I agree that major metropolises are not obscure (btw is there a better term that should be used - "obscure" sounds Orientalist - perhaps "out-of-the-way" or "unusual"?)

How about less-travelled?

I'm not even convinced that "less-travelled" is a good description for some of these places...I mean, Canada? Mexico? Just to name a few. --06mea 17:29, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

A specific place should be considered obscure by Williams standards if nobody in the undergraduate population was born there or lived there. That would eliminate some of the capitals (Honolulu) and big metropolises (Beijing, Hong Kong). Come on...the capital of Greece is not obscure.