Anonymous

Changes

Talk:Campus controversies

206 bytes added, 19:11, March 16, 2006
no edit summary
OK, so it looks like we'll have separate articles for this stuff. For future "controversy" articles, try to use a title that is immediately recognizable, and not an acronym/neologism that recently emerged from someone's posterior. Also, the content of the articles should include the stuff that's actually INTERESTING. Why was there a controversy? What was the extent of the controversy? What was the response of the administration? The exact contents of emails, for example, are relatively unimportant. So are the identities of the involved parties, unless they are "famous" for some other reason, and it is enlightening to connect the dots. --[[User:06emm|Evan]] 01:52, 16 March 2006 (EST)
 
===Irony===
It's pretty ironic that the content of this page includes the debate over the content of this page. Makes the whole thing seem kind of silly. --[[User:06mea|06mea]] 18:11, 16 March 2006 (EST)
<!-- PLEASE add your comments to the appropriate section above -->
18
edits